Tuesday 2 December 2014

HSC Financial Ratio - LIQUIDITY


http://lydialeeleuts.blogspot.com.au/2014/12/hsc-financial-ratio-liquidity.html

LIQUIDITY-CURRENT RATIO: WHAT IS IT?


liquidity -  A focus on the current ratio: it involves the liquid assets of a business and refers to the ability of a business to quickly convert its assets to cash. This also is known as "marketability."

The Formula for calculating the Current Ratio [also known as the Working Capital Ratio]:

WHY DOES THE CURRENT RATIO MATTER?


The current ratio is important because of this liquidity ratio (*) is used as an active indicator to measure the ability of a business to pay its short-term obligations (debts and payables). The larger the current ratio, the more capable the business is of paying its debts and payables, or the better the financial position of the business.

This ratio used to appraise the debt exposure represented on the balance sheet.
It is suggested that a current ratio of 2:1 is about right for most businesses (Helfert, 2001) because this proportion appears to permit a shrinkage of up to half in the value of current assets, while still providing enough cash to cover all current liabilities. In this case, for every $2 of current assets, there is $1 of current liability, and therefore the business is able to meet its short-term [less than 12 months] to cover all debts and payables.

Obviously as mentioned, the larger the Current Ratio, the better the position of the debt holders. Helfert (2001) advises that because a higher ratio would certainly appear to provide a comfortable support against drastic loses of value in the events of business failure, hence, a large excess of current assets over current liabilities is to help protect claims. Also, this should inventory have to be liquidated at a forced sale and accounts receivable involve sizable collection issues.

However, in viewing from another angle, it is warned that an excessively high current ratio might signal slack management practices because it could indicate idle cash balances and poor credit management that result in overextended accounts receivable (Helfert, 2001). Further, the issues of going concerns are crucial in business management. Helfert argues that the above common rule of 2:1 for the current ratio is the problem of not reflecting the top priority of management of going concerns. Therefore, according to Helfert, a lender or creditor looking for future business with a successful client should bear this in mind; they are advised to turn to the type of cash flow analysis to judge the viability of the business as a client.


Reference:
Helfert, E., A. (2001). Techniques of Financial Analysis - A Guide to Value Creation. Irwin McGraw-Hill. Singapore

(*)
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/l/liquidityratios.aspoutlines three main types of Liquidity Ratios as below:
        - the Current Ratio,
        -the Quick Ratio, and 
        -the Operating Cash Flow Ratio.  
These Liquidity Ratios are used to measure the capacity of the business to meet short-term financial commitments as they become due [less than a year].


====================
Links for today
my Financial Ratios page       Working Capital Management
LiquidityRisk Management
 

Video clips / YouTubes
ALaccounting (6'15)    MoneyWeekVideos (6'11)






Monday 6 October 2014

Balanced Scorecard – An Integrated Tool in Teaching


Implementing the Balanced Scorecard as an Integrated Tool and an effective Teaching Management Strategy at Classroom Level


"Any idea can bring some certain value”-Miller Hoa
"Strategy is actually about beliefs. Beliefs will drive choices. Choices will drive initiatives." 
Angus Dawson – Corporate Finance Practice in Asia. McKinsey Asia (CPA Australia



What is the Balanced Scorecard strategy?

RATIONALE AND Background



The Balanced Scorecard tool was originally designed for business management in measuring business performance. 

In 1992, Dr. Robert Kaplan and Dr. David Norton developed, and delivered the concept of the balanced scorecard that focuses on measuring the drive performance of businesses.
In 1996, the authors published a book called ‘The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy Into Action’. The balanced scorecard strategy, also called the Kaplan’s method or tool was successfully implemented in business management by a range of different businesses/services, both for profit and not-for-profit organisations, including public schools, in order to measure the operating performance towards the organisation’s objectives and goals.
It is believed that if you cannot measure the business/service performance, you cannot manage and improve it (L.Kevin as cited in Kaplan 2010) for the sustainable and developmental business/service as a whole.
Interestingly, the Balanced Scorecard strategy is used for not only to measure past performance but also to assess how well the business/service is positioned for the future (The Wallace Foundation, 2010). For that reason, Balance Scorecard is considered as a powerful tool that can be used for any workforce sectors. This tool encompasses the perspectives of four components or driven forces for a sustainable business that need to be analysed: Finance, Customers, Business Processes, and Learning and GrowthSee Figure 1.
http://lydialeeleuts.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/balanced-scorecard-integrated-tool-in.html
Figure1- The Balanced Scorecard components used to measure business performance
Original source from Dr. Kaplan and Dr. Norton, 1992
Notes
-The Financial Perspective: focuses on the performance in financing and using the business' available resources effectively that bring the positive benefits to all stakeholders of employer/s, employees/workers, customers and the business itself. In business, this perspective is also known and referred to as the business terminology of Stewardship.
-The Learning and Growth Perspective: focuses on using the organisation's human capital [its people]- such as employees' satisfaction and value, implementing and improving the organisation's infrastructure technology to achieve its own value and culture.  
-The Business Process Perspective: focuses on the internal process targeting the quality and efficiency in controlling the business.
-The Customers Perspective: focuses on the customers' satisfaction, customers' retention, customers' disciplines and the common value.

For analysing the business performance, the relevant informative data of all components must be collected. According to the Investopedia (n.d.), the collections of a variety of data for the analysis of all driven forces of a business are crucial to providing quantitative results which are interpreted and used in making better long-term decisions. 

Balanced scorecard in teaching at the classroom level

At the classroom level, for a number of years, the balanced scorecard strategy has been utilised in my teaching sessions. I found this method is an effective teaching strategy and an integrated tool that meets students’ and teacher’s needs and wants in terms of students’ learning achievements and teacher’s teaching satisfaction - the teacher's teaching growth.
As mentioned, this tool has been used in the measurement of teaching and learning performance towards the student self-discipline and inspiration, and satisfaction degrees of teacher's learning and growth. Therefore, it is also considered as the tool of motive measurement  (Kaplan & Norton 1996, as cited in Kaplan 2010) of students’ learning and teacher’s teaching-objectives/goals through achievements, and implementing teaching methods into classrooms. In practice, stemming from the original Balance Scorecard introduced by Kaplan and Norton, the following introduces a modified Balanced Scorecard model to measure teaching and learning performance at the classroom level. See Figure 2 below.
http://lydialeeleuts.blogspot.com.au/2014/10/balanced-scorecard-integrated-tool-in.html
Figure2-A Modified Balanced Scorecard model: can be used as an integrated tool at the classroom level

Why should the Balanced Scorecard tool be implemented in teaching at the classroom level?

In terms of complying with teaching standards, the necessary changes for the better of teaching are crucial to making positive differences in education. The changes are often confronted with resistance. However, the resistance may result in individuals [students, teachers, and non-teaching staff] becoming more accountable for their actions (Charter Global Management Accountant, 2014) that improve learning and teaching performance.

In regard to accountability, although running or conducting training (learning and teaching) sessions at the classroom level  is not to run a profit business - in reality, like operations of any business or service, the teaching job requires a series or process of hard work in which trainers/teachers/educators are considered as workers to get the job done properly. In business or service operations, all works need to be managed or controlled and evaluated for business or service improvement, sustainability, and development. To strongly sustain teaching, teaching work needs to be measured because from the Kaplan’s concept mentioned, if you cannot measure teaching performance, you cannot improve it. As discussed, the Balanced Scorecard tool has been successfully implemented for the measurement of business performance in a range of businesses and services including the performance in training at school level. Further, the Balanced Scorecard at the school level refers to implementing a powerful measurement technique for school activities. Understandably, these include learning and teaching activities that are performed within classrooms; therefore the Balanced Scorecard can be used to measure learning and teaching performance at the classroom level.

By implementing the Balanced Scorecard tool in classrooms, it allows the teacher to look ahead, with leading indicators [they measure outcomes of early value-chain teaching activities], rather than always looking back with lagging indicators [they measure the results too late] (Kaplan& Miyake, 2010). This pushes and pulls the teacher to act and create value-added in teaching toward student learning and academic outputs.

In order to create teaching value added, at the classroom level having differentiation and multilevel learning, to satisfy student learning outcomes, the internal and external driving forces [such as experience, updating knowledge and skills, new technologies, and compliance with new teaching standards] push the teacher to improve all aspects of teaching. As a consequence, with the intrinsic teaching value, the teacher needs to make the right decisions for his/her actions that positively and effectively contribute towards shifting quality teaching and achieving dynamic requirements that directly benefit our students in terms of achieving their learning outcomes.


How to apply the balanced scorecard at the classroom level
See an illustration of implementing the Balanced Scorecard at the classroom level on my Google site



References
Charter Global Management Accountant (2014). Balanced Scorecard. Retrieved from

Kaplan, R. (2010). Conceptual Foundations of the Balanced Scorecard. Working Knowledge. Harvard Business School. Retrieved 3 October 2014 from

Kaplan, R. & Miyake, D.(2010). The Balanced Scorecard. For a strategy-focused school district, it’s a route for driving systemwide performance measurements, as Atlanta’s experience suggests. Retrieved 6 October 2014 from http://www.aasa.org/SchoolAdministratorArticle.aspx?id=11784

The Wallace Foundation (2010). “Balanced Scorecard:” A Tool For Better Education Planning. Retrieved 6 October 2014 from http://www.wallacefoundation.org/view-latest-news/InTheNews/Pages/Balanced-Scorecard-A-Tool-For-Better-Education-Planning.aspx






Related links

Performance Management
Measurement and Rewards

Support for teachers



Harvard Business Review
Balanced Scorecard Institute (BSI-Strategy Management Group: Balanced Scorecard Basics


Saturday 13 September 2014

Techniques for developing Critical Thinking


Techniques for Critical Thinking in Practice 

Sources: Adapted from Len Nixon – UTS Handouts – Autumn 2013 - Week 2
 -  Visible Thinking,  Visible Thinking in Action 
Blooms Taxonomy
REMEMBERING - UNDERSTANDING
APPLYING - ANALYSING
(MIDDLE ORDER THINKING SKILLS)
EVALUATING - CREATING
This routine helps students investigate truth claims and issues related to truth. It allows students to stand back and think about ways to obtain information when trying to find out about the truth of something
This routine helps students develop thoughtful interpretation by encouraging them to reason with evidence. Students learn to identify truth claims and explore strategies for uncovering the truth.
This spotting routine asks learners to spot “thinking hotspots” about the truth of a topic or situation that might be worth more attention
This routine helps students cast a wide net for facts and arguments by imagining how an issue looks from different points of view
This routine helps students consider different and diverse perspectives involved in and around a topic
This routine is about distinguishing facts from thoughts and judgments. It helps organize ideas and feeling in order consider a situation where fairness may be at stake
This routine is about identifying and evaluating specific actions that might make a situation fair. This routine involves students in generating and evaluating options
This routine encourages students to consider past perspectives and develop a better understanding of how thinking changes over time and across culture
Tug for Truth
This routine encourages students to reason carefully about the ‘pull’ of various factors that are relevant to a question of truth. It helps them to appreciate the complexity of matters which may at first seem black and white
This routine helps students make connections between new ideas and prior knowledge
This is a routine for understanding why something is the way it is. This routine can get at either causal explanation or explanation in terms of purposes or both
This routine helps students capture the core and heart of the matter being studied or discussed. It also can involve them in summing things up and upcoming to some tentative conclusion. [It constructs one’s own thinking]
This routine encourages students to think about something, such as a problem, question or topic, and then articulate their thoughts
This routine helps students describe what they see or know and asks them to build explanations. It promotes evidential reasoning (evidence-based reasoning) so that students can illustrate their knowledge and understanding
This routine activates prior knowledge, generate ideas and curiously and set the stage for deeper inquiry
This routine helps students reflect on their thinking about a topic or issue and explore HOW and WHY that thinking has changed
This routine helps students flesh out an idea or proposition and eventually evaluate it.
Creative Questions (Low, Mid or Higher order)
This routine encourages students to create interesting questions and then imaginatively mess around with them for a while in order to explore their creative possibilities
This routine helps students explore different perspectives and viewpoints as they try to imagine things, events, problems, or issue differently
This routine helps students more effectively flesh out and evaluate options, alternatives, and choices in a decision-making situation
This routine makes thinking visible by helping students to find the creative thinking behind ordinary things
This routine fosters creative thinking. It helps explore ‘hidden’ options indecision
                 Learning blog 2


Friday 5 September 2014

Commerce Stage 5 - Option 6: Political Involvement - Pressure Groups

Year 10 Commerce - Pressure Groups

Leading questions:
1-What do we understand about Pressure Groups and Individuals?
2-What are their rights and responsibilities in the democratic process?

Today we will look at the role that pressure groups play in the democratic process and the role of the individual in the democratic process.

Where are we up to with this topic?


What do we understand about Pressure Groups?

What are pressure groups?
pressure group is an organised group that seeks to influence government (public) policy or protect or advance a particular cause or interest.


-a group that tries to influence public policy in the interest of a particular cause, such as "an environmental pressure group"

Pressure groups are sometimes referred to as interest groups or lobbies. 

Examples of pressure groups are as below.





Strategies of pressure groups
 


Link: my commerce lesson page