My Construction of a Differentiation Matrix
Differentiated Strategy in Teaching HSC Business Studies - Topic: OPERATIONS
Source: Adapted from Len Nixon – Business Studies Teaching Method 3- Autumn 2013 – UTS Week 2
My Construction of a Differentiation Matrix
Differentiated Strategy in Teaching HSC Business Studies - Topic: OPERATIONS
Source: Adapted from Len Nixon – Business Studies Teaching Method 3- Autumn 2013 – UTS Week 2
Flipping Book (for learning purpose only)
Year 11 Business Studies - The Business Planning Process: ORGANISING RESOURCES
Sources / Authors
|
About the Arguments
| ||
|
The word “argument” can be used to designate a dispute or a fight, or it can be used more technically. It refers to a collection of truth-bearers (that is, the things that bear truth and falsity, or are true and false) some of which are offered as reasons for one of them, the conclusion.
| ||
Argument is an activity we all engage in, with varying results, in every walk of life. Philosophers have developed powerful methods for classifying arguments and identifying common errors in reasoning. Argument and Critical Thinking teaches these methods and applies them to real-life arguments, both written and spoken. It is thus an introduction to communication and applied logic.
| |||
The Argument answers the questions "What is it?" "What category does it belong to?" In other words, the Argument attempts to assign a specific case to a larger category because it shares the essential characteristics of that category. The argument requires that we generate a list of essential criteria of the term (category)
The definition argument has two areas of major concern:
1) the criteria and whether they sufficiently characterize the y term (category), and
2) the match, or whether the x term (specific case) actually possess the criteria.
During the match portion of the definition argument, on the other hand, our concern is to demonstrate that the criteria apply to the x term.
| |||
An argument is a sequence of statements called premises, plus a statement called the conclusion. A valid argument is an argument such that the conclusion is true whenever the premises are all true.
| |||
An argument (in the context of logic) is defined as a set of premises and a conclusion where the conclusion and premises are separated by some trigger word, phrase or mark known as a turnstile.
The turnstiles seem to indicate where the premises come as opposed to where the conclusion comes. Examples of turnstiles (indicating either conclusion or premises) are: so, thus, hence, since, because, it follows that, for the reason that, from this it can be seen that.
| |||
The argument may show that one meaning is more correct than (an)other(s), or that no meanings are correct, or that the definition can be shown by the actions of a particular group (which may ally or oppose itself with the term). The argument may posit that many definitions of the term are in circulation (and then describe these definitions in detail), thus proving the slipperiness or controversy of the term itself; or the argument may posit that several different-sounding definitions are actually very much alike.
| |||
|
|
Argument is the most fundamental concept in our study of critical thinking. Argument refers to "a set of propositions, or statements, which are designed to convince a reader or listener of a claim, or conclusion, and which include at least one reason (premise) for accepting the conclusion."
| ||
|
|
A logical argument (or just argument) is a process of creating a new statement from one or more existing statements.
An argument proceeds from a set of premises to a conclusion, by means of logical implication, via a procedure called logical inference.
An argument may have more than one premise, but only one conclusion.
| ||
It links to a coherent series of reasons, statements, or facts intended to support or establish a point of view (Merriam Webster, 2020) |

2018/2019 Individual
Tax Rate
|
Taxable Income
|
Notes [Tax Obligations]
|
Nil
|
$0 - $18,200
|
No Tax Obligations
|
19%
|
$18,201 - $37,000
|
19c for each $1 over $18,200, and upto
$37,000
|
32.5%
|
$37,001 - $90,000
|
$3,572 plus 32.5c for each $1 over $37,000,
and upto $90,000
|
37%
|
$90,001 - $180,000
|
20,797 plus 37c for each $1 over $90,000,
and upto $180,000
|
45%
|
$180,001 and over
|
$54,097 plus 45c for each $1 over $180,000
|
Step
1
|
Taxable Income = Assessable Income -
Deductions
|
XXXX
|
|
Step
2
|
Tax Obligations
|
Tax Obligations: Use the rate in Table 1
|
XX
|
Step
3
|
Plus
|
Medicare levy rate (2%) x Taxable
Income
|
+ X
|
Step
4
|
Less
|
PAYG: TOTAL TAX WITHHELD (shown in
the Payment Summary)
|
- X
|
Step
5
|
Less
|
Tax Offsets
|
- X
|
Step
6
|
Tax Return
|
Refundable OR Income Tax Payable
|
= XX
|
Step
1
|
Taxable Income = Assessable Income –
Deductions
TI = $115,000 - $2,500
TI= $112,500
|
$112,500
|
|
Step
2
|
Tax Obligations
@tax rate = 37% |
Refer to Table 1, because Zainab's Taxable Income is
greater than $90,000, hence, the tax rate of 37% is
applied, and Zainab's Tax Obligation is calculated as follows.
Zainab's Tax Obligation will be 20,797
plus 37c for each $1 over $90,000, and upto $180,000
Therefore:
Zainab's Tax Obligation = $20,797 + 37% x ($112,500
- $90,000)
= $20,797
+ 37% x $22,500
= $20,797 + $8,325
= $29,122
(Note: Where does
the figure of $20,797 come from?
Because Zainab’s Taxable Income is
greater than $90,000, hence, there is two (2) layers of tax rates will be
applied:
1-Tax layer 1: Tax rate is 19% or 19c for each $1 over $18,200,
and up to $37,000. That is 19% x ($37,000 - $18,201) = $3,572 [rounded]
2-Tax layer 2: Tax Obligation is $3,572[from the tax layer 1] plus 32.5c for each $1
over $37,000, and up to $90,000. That is
$3,572 + 32.5% x ($90,000 – $37,001)
= $3,572 + 32.5% x $52,999
= $3,572 + $17,225
= $20,797 [This amount is rounded and embedded with the Tax layer 1])
|
$29,122
|
Step
3
|
Plus
|
Medicare levy = Levy rate 2% of Taxable
Income
= 2% x $112,500
= $2,250
|
+ $2,250
|
Step
4
|
Less
|
PAYG: TOTAL TAX WITHHELD (shown in
the Payment Summary)
= $39,000
|
- $39,000
|
Step
5
|
Less
|
Tax Offsets
= $630
|
- $630
|
Step
6
|
Tax Return
|
Tax Return = Tax Obligation + Medicare levy - Total Tax Withheld – Tax Offset
= $29,122 +
$2,250 - $39,000 - $630
= - $8,258
The figure of Tax Return is 'Negative', therefore, Zainab would
receive her Refundable from the Tax Office. It means that the ATO would pay the
Refundable amount of $8,258 to the Zainab's account.
|
= $8,258
Refundable
|
-Residents